e-ISSN: 2618-6586 Open Access · Peer-Reviewed JETOL on DergiPark
JETOL — Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning
Publisher
Gürhan Durak
Publication Model
Periodical (January – May – September)
Status
Open for Submissions

Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization

Research Article

  • Sercan Uzun Milli Savunma Üniversitesi, Deniz Astsubay Meslek Yüksekokulu, Müdürlük 0000-0003-0895-8398
Download PDF DOI: 10.31681/jetol.1915276
Published in
Volume 9, Issue 3 (2026)
Pages
410–432
Publication Date
September 30, 2026
Submission Date
March 24, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 5, 2026
Subjects
Instructional Design, Instructional Technologies, Educational Technology and Computing

Abstract

Adaptive gamification has emerged as a prominent strategy for addressing engagement and motivation challenges in higher education and distance learning. Recent research has increasingly framed adaptivity as a run-time, algorithmic process driven by artificial intelligence and learning analytics. While such systems offer computational efficiency, they frequently reduce adaptivity to parameter optimization within fixed instructional structures, resulting in limited transparency and superficial personalization. This article argues that adaptive gamification should be reconceptualized as a design-time pedagogical architecture rather than a reactive algorithmic feature. Drawing on a conceptual synthesis of adaptive gamification literature, the study distinguishes between the temporal locus of adaptivity (run-time versus design-time) and the scope of adaptation (element-level versus scenario-level), foregrounding a structural imbalance: adaptation has been elaborated almost entirely at the element level, while scenario-level alternatives remain largely untheorized. Grounded in self-determination theory and informed by systemic gamification theory, the article proposes scenario-level design-time adaptive gamification as a coherent alternative that foregrounds learner agency, pedagogical transparency, and instructional integrity. By embedding adaptivity into pre-authored pedagogically equivalent scenarios, this approach accommodates motivational diversity while preserving assessment equivalence. The study concludes by positioning adaptivity as a pedagogical responsibility rather than a purely technical capability.

Keywords

  • adaptive gamification
  • design-time adaptivity
  • scenario-level personalization
  • pedagogical architecture
  • self-determination theory
References (60)
  1. Alalgawi, D., & Sadkhan, S. B. (2022). Adapt gamification to learners' preferences. 2022 Fifth College of Science International Conference of Recent Trends in Information Technology (CSCTIT), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCTIT56299.2022.10145630
  2. Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., & Specht, M. (2019). The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032
  3. Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19–33.
  4. Benkhalfallah, F., Laouar, M. R., & Benkhalfallah, M. S. (2024). Examining adaptive e-learning approaches to enhance learning and individual experiences. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 13(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.240
  5. Bennani, S., Maalel, A., & Ben Ghezala, H. (2022). Adaptive gamification in e-learning: A literature review and future challenges. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22477
  6. Böckle, M., Micheel, I., Bick, M., & Novak, J. (2018). A design framework for adaptive gamification applications. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1227–1236). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.151
  7. Bozkurt, A., & Durak, G. (2018). A systematic review of gamification research: In pursuit of Homo Ludens. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018070102
  8. Brandl, L. C., & Schrader, A. (2024). Student player types in higher education: Trial and clustering analyses. Education Sciences, 14(4), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040352
  9. Chalco Challco, G., Bittencourt, I. I., Reis, M., Santos, J., & Isotani, S. (2023). Gamiflow: Towards a flow theory-based gamification framework for learning scenarios. In N. Wang, G. Rebolledo-Mendez, V. Dimitrova, N. Matsuda, & O. C. Santos (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. Posters and late breaking results, workshops and tutorials, industry and innovation tracks, practitioners, doctoral consortium and blue sky (Vol. 1831, pp. 415–421). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_65
  10. Chapman, J. R., Kohler, T. B., Rich, P. J., & Trego, A. (2025). Maybe we’ve got it wrong. An experimental evaluation of self-determination and flow theory in gamification. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2242981
  11. Chernikova, O., Sommerhoff, D., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Nickl, M., Seidel, T., Kasneci, E., Küchemann, S., Kuhn, J., Fischer, F., & Heitzmann, N. (2025). Personalization through adaptivity or adaptability? A meta-analysis on simulation-based learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 46, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100662
  12. Coelho, F., & Abreu, A. M. (2025). Systemic gamification theory (SGT): A holistic model for inclusive gamified digital learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(7), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9070070
  13. Dalponte Ayastuy, M., Torres, D., & Fernández, A. (2021). Adaptive gamification in collaborative systems, a systematic mapping study. Computer Science Review, 39, 100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100333
  14. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
  15. Dumas Reyssier, S., Hallifax, S., Serna, A., Marty, J.-C., Simonian, S., & Lavoué, É. (2024). How does adaptive gamification impact different types of student motivation over time? Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6043–6062. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2248220
  16. Elkady, M., Dassisti, M., Zazzera, E., & Stigliano, G. (2025). Designing a user-centred adaptive gamified learning system: A multidisciplinary approach from pedagogy to artificial intelligence. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 19(1), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.19.1.4161
  17. Ertan Şevk, K., & Arkün Kocadere, S. (2024). A review on personalization of gamified learning environments. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 17(4), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1478810
  18. Fisher, N., & Kulshreshth, A. K. (2024). Exploring dynamic difficulty adjustment methods for video games. Virtual Worlds, 3(2), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds3020012
  19. Gao, F. (2024). Advancing gamification research and practice with three underexplored ideas in self-determination theory. TechTrends, 68(3), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00968-9
  20. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A. T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216
  21. González-López, O. R., Buenadicha-Mateos, M., Tato-Jiménez, J. L., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2025). Adaptive gamification in higher education: Tailoring game elements to player profiles and gender differences. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251377738
  22. Guo, Z., Thawonmas, R., & Ren, X. (2024). Rethinking dynamic difficulty adjustment for video game design. Entertainment Computing, 50, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100663
  23. Güzel, S. (2023). Gamified lesson plan development with ELT pre-service teachers: A gamified Google Classroom experience. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(1), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1158404
  24. Hallifax, S., Serna, A., Marty, J.-C., & Lavoué, É. (2019a). Adaptive gamification in education: A literature review of current trends and developments. In M. Scheffel, J. Broisin, V. Pammer-Schindler, A. Ioannou, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Transforming learning with meaningful technologies (pp. 294–307). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_22
  25. Hallifax, S., Serna, A., Marty, J.-C., Lavoué, G., & Lavoué, É. (2019b). Factors to consider for tailored gamification. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 559–572). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347167
  26. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  27. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
  28. Idika, S., & Saihi, S. (2025). Enhancing student engagement through AI-driven adaptive learning and gamification. British Journal of Education, 13(12), 57–103. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol13n1257103
  29. Jayalath, J., & Esichaikul, V. (2022). Gamification to enhance motivation and engagement in blended e-learning for technical and vocational education and training. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09466-2
  30. Kalay, A., & Arıkan, Y. D. (2023). The effects of gamified instructional material on learners' perceived motivation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(3), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1353075
  31. Kamunya, S. M., Mirirti, E., Oboko, R. O., & Maina, E. M. (2020). An adaptive gamification model for e-learning. 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa), 1–10. https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/server/api/core/bitstreams/98aefb63-7091-4be7-88cc-6ba5b992f669/content
  32. Kaya, O. S., & Ercag, E. (2023). The impact of applying challenge-based gamification program on students’ learning outcomes: Academic achievement, motivation and flow. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10053–10078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11585-z
  33. Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
  34. Kiili, K., de Freitas, S., Arnab, S., & Lainema, T. (2012). The design principles for flow experience in educational games. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.060
  35. Kirchner-Krath, J., Altmeyer, M., Schürmann, L., Kordyaka, B., Morschheuser, B., Klock, A. C. T., Nacke, L., Hamari, J., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2024). Uncovering the theoretical basis of user types: An empirical analysis and critical discussion of user typologies in research on tailored gameful design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 190, 103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103314
  36. Klock, A. C. T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M. S., & Hamari, J. (2020). Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495
  37. Kode, O. (2025). Gamification in education: Review of challenges and recommendations for effective practice. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics, 14(4), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijci.2025.140402
  38. Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963
  39. Lavoué, É., Monterrat, B., Desmarais, M., & George, S. (2019). Adaptive gamification for learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2823710
  40. Marczewski, A. (2015). Even ninja monkeys like to play: Gamification, game thinking & motivational design. Gamified UK.
  41. Monterrat, B., Desmarais, M., Lavoué, É., & George, S. (2015). A player model for adaptive gamification in learning environments. In C. Conati, N. Heffernan, A. Mitrovic, & M. F. Verdejo (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 297–306). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_30
  42. Monterrat, B., Lavoué, É., & George, S. (2015). Toward an adaptive gamification system for learning environments. In S. Zvacek, M. T. Restivo, J. Uhomoibhi, & M. Helfert (Eds.), Computer supported education (Vol. 510, pp. 115–129). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25768-6_8
  43. Naseer, F., Khan, M. N., Addas, A., Awais, Q., & Ayub, N. (2025). Game mechanics and artificial intelligence personalization: A framework for adaptive learning systems. Education Sciences, 15(3), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030301
  44. Pastushenko, O., Oliveira, W., Isotani, S., & Hruška, T. (2020). A methodology for multimodal learning analytics and flow experience identification within gamified assignments. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ‘20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383060
  45. Puig, A., Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez, Á., & Gallego, I. (2023). Evaluating learner engagement with gamification in online courses. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1535. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031535
  46. Rodríguez, I., Puig, A., & Rodríguez, À. (2022). Towards adaptive gamification: A method using dynamic player profile and a case study. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010486
  47. Rowicka, M., & Postek, S. (2023). Who likes to learn new things? How gamification user types and satisfaction but not the frustration of basic psychological needs explain the preference for learning new things. Acta Psychologica, 236, 103925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103925
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  49. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
  50. Sezgin, S., & Yüzer, T. V. (2022). Analysing adaptive gamification design principles for online courses. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(3), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1817559
  51. Simsek, E., & Karakus Yilmaz, T. (2025). A systematic review of the effects of gamification in online learning environments on learning outcomes. Open Praxis, 17(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.692
  52. Smirani, L. K., & Yamani, H. (2024). Analysing the impact of gamification techniques on enhancing learner engagement, motivation, and knowledge retention: A structural equation modelling approach. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(9), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.9.3563
  53. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  54. Şengel, E., & Fidan, A. (2022). An examination of opinions of teacher candidates on a course enriched through gamification. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1106781
  55. Taşkın, N., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2022). Player/user types for gamification. In O. Bernardes, V. Amorim, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Handbook of research on cross-disciplinary uses of gamification in organizations (pp. 62–85). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9223-6.ch003
  56. Tyack, A., & Mekler, E. D. (2024). Self-determination theory and HCI games research: Unfulfilled promises and unquestioned paradigms. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3673230
  57. Van Houdt, L., Millecamp, M., Verbert, K., & Vanden Abeele, V. (2020). Disambiguating preferences for gamification strategies to motivate pro-environmental behaviour. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY ‘20, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414244
  58. Zairon, I. Y., Tengku Wook, T. S. M., M. Salleh, S., & Dahlan, H. A. (2025). Adaptive gamification in collaborative virtual classroom: A systematic review. PeerJ Computer Science, 11, e3146. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3146
  59. Zhang, Z., & Huang, X. (2024). Exploring the impact of the adaptive gamified assessment on learners in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21869–21889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12708-w
  60. Zhao, X. (2025). Analyzing factors promoting students' autonomous motivation from the perspective of self-determination theory. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 115(1), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.LD29295

This article is published under the CC BY 4.0 license.