e-ISSN: 2618-6586 Open Access · Peer-Reviewed JETOL on DergiPark
JETOL — Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning
Publisher
Gürhan Durak
Publication Model
Periodical (January – May – September)
Status
Open for Submissions

Teachers’ experiences and perspectives in conducting synchronous classes: Affordances and challenges

Research Article

Download PDF DOI: 10.31681/jetol.1099870
Published in
Volume 6, Issue 3 (2023)
Pages
495–513
Publication Date
September 30, 2023
Submission Date
April 19, 2022
Acceptance Date
September 25, 2023
Subjects
Studies on Education

Abstract

Learning institutions in the Philippines employed online distance learning using the synchronous approach for real-time interaction among learners and teachers. While the arrangement is exploratory and contingent, and responsive to the continuity of learning during the pandemic, its impact remains uncertain. This is of interest including the teaching-learning process in online classes with regard to the domains of Community of Inquiry focusing on the cognitive, teaching and social presence. In generating data, this study utilized focus group discussions involving junior high school teachers (N=15) from public and private schools who tackled questions anchored on said domains. Codified and categorized according to themes, the respondents revealed that personal and professional gains are considered as benefits of online classes but retorted that financial, technical as well as teaching learning support are among the challenges. Learning tasks and skills application draw attention under the cognitive arena, while technology, support for learner engagement and student engagement strategies warrant emphasis under teaching presence. Modes of interaction, interaction resources and approaches to ensuring belongingness underpin the areas under social presence. Results further showed that the affordances and challenges faced by the teachers may be translated into opportunities for innovation, growth, and development.

Keywords

  • Community of Inquiry
  • online distance learning
  • teacher’s experiences
  • teacher’s perspectives
References (42)
  1. Ahmed, V., & Opoku, A. (2022). Technology supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: the case of COVID-19 pandemic. PubMed Central, 27(1), 365-405. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10639-021-10706-w
  2. Ancheta, R. F., & Ancheta, H. B. (2020). The new normal in education: a challenge to the private basic education institutions in the Philippines? International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 1-19. https://iiari.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-New-Normal-in-Education-1.pdf
  3. Anderson, T., Rouke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1875
  4. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope them: The case of the Philippines. PubMed Central, 26(6), 7321-7338. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10639-021-10589-x
  5. Clark, R.C.; Mayer, R.E. (2016). e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  6. De Villa, J. A. & Manalo F. K. (2020). Secondary teachers’ preparation, challenges, and coping mechanism in the implementation of distance learning in the new normal. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 144-154. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3717608
  7. Deped Tambayan Staff (2020). DepEd limits reimbursement of monthly communication allowance to P300. DEPED TAMBAYAN Education News & Downloads for Teachers. https://depedtambayan.org/allowance-reimbursement-deped/
  8. Dzakiria, H., Kasim, A., H. & Christopher, A. A.(2013). Effective Learning Interaction As A Prerequisite To Successful Open Distance Learning (Odl): A Case Study Of Learners In The Northern State Of Kedah And Perlis. Malaysia. Trukish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 111-125. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16895/176018
  9. Edgar J. Sintema (2020). E-Learning and Smart Revision Portal for Zambian Primary and Secondary School Learners: A Digitalized Virtual Classroom in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8253
  10. Eyles, A.; Gibbons, S.; Montebruno, P. (2020). Covid-19 school shutdowns: What will they do to our children’s education? A CEP Covid-19 analysis Briefing note No. 001. 2020. Available online: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/ download/cepcovid-19-00
  11. Garrison & Arbaugh (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
  12. Hash, P. M. (2021). Remote Learning in School Bands During the COVID-19 Shutdown. PubMed Central, 68(4), 381-397. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0022429420967008
  13. Hoofman J. & Secord, E. (2021). The Effect of COVID-19 on Education. . PubMed Central, 68(5), 1071-1079. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.pcl.2021.05.009
  14. K. Patricia Cross Academy. (n.d.). Getting Students to Apply What They Have Learned in a New Context, Retrieved March 27, 2019 from https://kpcrossacademy.org/getting-students-to-apply-what-they-have-learned-in-a-new
  15. Kear, Karen; Chetwynd, Frances and Jefferis, Helen (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: the role of personal profiles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.19710
  16. Kim J. (2020). Teaching and learning after COVID- 19. https://www.insidehighered.com/degitallearning/blogs/learning innovation/teaching ad- learning-after-covid-19
  17. Knilt. (2009, May 4). List of benefits for using a student-centered approach [Blog post]. Retrieved from Ohhttps://knilt.arcc.albany.edu/List_of_benefits_for_using_a_student-centered_approach
  18. Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Waters, Z., Gašević, D., Kitto, K., Hatala, M., & Siemens, G. (2016). Towards an automated content analysis of discussion transcripts: A cognitive presence case. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883950.
  19. Learn Alberta (2008, October 1). Assessment in Mathematics: Types of classroom assessment [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://new.learnalberta.ca/Resources/content/mewa/html/assessment/types.html
  20. Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. PubMed Central, 3, 1-18. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs12528-021-09274-2
  21. Mathew, I. R., & Iloanya, J. E. (2016). Open and Distance Learning: Benefits and challenges of technology usage fro online teaching and learning in Africa. Commonwealth of Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2543
  22. McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2015) Teaching in a Digital Age : How Educators use Technology to Improve Student Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3); 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
  23. Moore, M. G. (1989) Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. http://aris.teluq.uquebec.ca/portals/598/t3_moore1989.pdf
  24. Musingafi, M., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., Zebron, S. (2015), Challenges for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18); 59-66. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079750.pdf
  25. Nasir , N. S., Rosebery , A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Nayak, J., Mishra, M., Naik, B., Swapnarekha, H., Cengiz, K., & Shanmuganathan V. (2021). An impact study of COVID‐19 on six different industries: Automobile, energy and power, agriculture, education, travel and tourism and consumer electronics. PubMed Central, 10(1111), 12677. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fexsy.12677
  27. Norwood, A. (2022, March 27). What does Self-Assessment and Self-Reflection bring to the Learning Journey. School box. https://freeurlshortener.net/QBS
  28. What is Formative Assessment? - Strategies & Examples. (2017, April 11). Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-formative-assessment-strategies-examples.html.
  29. Perez, A. (2021) Internet access 'main challenge' for teachers in distance teaching in PH: study ABS-CBN News, Retrieved from https://news.abs-cbn.com/spotlight/08/17/21/internet-access-main-challenge-for-ph-teachers-study
  30. Pokhrel, S. & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Sage Journal, 8(1):133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2347631120983481
  31. Radu, M. C., Schnakovszky, C., Herghelegiu, E., Ciubotariu, V. A., & Cristea, I. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Educational Process: A Student Survey. PubMed Central, 17(21), 7770. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph17217770
  32. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1), 68-88. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/18713/RichardsonSwan%20JALN7(1).pdf
  33. Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature (Winner 2009 Best Research Article Award). International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 23(1), 19-48.
  34. Schindler, LA, Burkholder, GJ, Morad, OA, Marshet, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
  35. Shea, Peter & Bidjerano, Temi (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
  36. Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004411
  37. Szapkiw, M. and A. (2010) Garrison et al.’s Community of Inquiry Framework. Retrieved from http://www.amandaszapkiw.com/elearning/principles-of-design/module-1/garrison_et_als_community_of_inquiry_framework.html
  38. Tanner, K. D. (2017). Promoting student metacognition. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(2); 113-199. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
  39. Toader D-C, Boca G, Toader R, Măcelaru M, Toader C, Ighian D, Rădulescu AT. (2020). The Effect of Social Presence and Chatbot Errors on Trust. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010256
  40. UNESCO (2020). Distance Learning Solutions. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/solutions
  41. University of Tasmania. (n.d.). Teaching and Learning Examples of Learning Activities. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/learning-activities-and-delivery-modes/planning-learning-activities/examples-of-learning-activities
  42. Zehra Akyol &D. Randy Garrison (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005(https://star.ehe.osu.edu/scaffolding-module/vygotsky/).

This article is published under the CC BY 4.0 license.