e-ISSN: 2618-6586 Open Access · Peer-Reviewed JETOL on DergiPark
JETOL — Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning
Publisher
Gürhan Durak
Publication Model
Periodical (January – May – September)
Status
Open for Submissions

From human-centered to posthumanist AI-driven cross-cultural education: Practical and ethical dilemmas

Research Article

Download PDF DOI: 10.31681/jetol.1793483
Published in
Volume 9, Issue 2 (2026)
Pages
286–297
Publication Date
May 31, 2026
Submission Date
September 30, 2025
Acceptance Date
February 8, 2026
Subjects
Educational Technology and Computing

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed cross-cultural education from a human-centered paradigm into a posthumanist ecology, distributing cognitive agency across networks of human and non-human actors. While theoretically promising, this shift is fraught with practical and ethical dilemmas that threaten the goals of cross-cultural education. Employing critical discourse analysis, this paper provides a novel analysis that first examines the epistemic shortcomings of human-centered cross-cultural education—including curricular bias and ineffective pedagogy, research limitations, and Eurocentric biases and misrepresentations. It then demonstrates how these shortcomings are systematically automated, amplified, and reinforced by posthumanist AI systems with opaque algorithms trained on biased datasets. The resulting practical problems—automation of biased data, undefined non-human agency, exclusion of human values, and culturally misaligned generated content—undermine AI ethical principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, and reliability. The synthesized analysis concludes that ignoring these considerations privileges dominant Western epistemology, with its inherent biases, and further marginalizes alternative knowledge systems, thereby turning AI-driven cross-cultural education into an engine of Eurocentric digital colonialism. To counter this, the article proposes a new model that addresses the identified problems and integrates essential human values—such as empathy, cooperation, and communication—for culturally competent AI-driven education.

Keywords

  • Posthumanism
  • AI-driven education
  • cross-cultural education challenges
  • cultural competency
  • Eurocentrism
  • digital colonialism
References (57)
  1. Ahmad, I. S., Dudy, S., Ramachandranpillai, R., & Church, K. (2024). Are generative language models multicultural? A study on Hausa culture and emotions using ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19504.
  2. Akabli, J., & Chahdi, C. (2022). Hollywood's (mis) construction of gender: The aesthetics and politics of stigmatising Arab/Muslim women. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(8), 17–28.
  3. Al-Sibai, Y. (2022). The misrepresentation of Arab and Muslim women in Western media. Journal ISSN, 259, 9953.
  4. Alshokhada, A. K. T. (2025). Beyond stereotype: A critical study of Arab representation in Western and American literary works. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 258–271.
  5. Andreotti, V. (2011). (Towards) decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 381-397.
  6. Basnet, M. (2024). Cultural diversity and curriculum. Panauti Journal, 2, 1-9.
  7. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  8. Cao, Y. T., Sotnikova, A., Daumé III, H., Rudinger, R., & Zou, L. (2022). Theory-grounded measurement of U.S. social stereotypes in English language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 1276–1295). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.92
  9. Cao, Y., Zhou, L., Lee, S., Cabello, L., Chen, M., & Hershcovich, D. (2023). Assessing cross-cultural alignment between ChatGPT and human societies: An empirical study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17466.
  10. Chakrabarty, D. (2009). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference (New edition). Princeton University Press.
  11. Chow, R. (2023). Film as ethnography: Or, translation between cultures in the postcolonial world. In Postcolonialism (pp. 1929–1956). Routledge.
  12. Connell, R. (2020). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Routledge.
  13. Datatron (2019). Real-life examples of discriminating artificial intelligence. https://datatron.com/real-life-examples-of-discriminating-artificial-intelligence/
  14. Dev, S., Goyal, J., Tewari, D., Dave, S., & Prabhakaran, V. (2023). Building socio-culturally inclusive stereotype resources with community engagement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10514.
  15. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10514
  16. Firdaus, T. (2025). The philosophical construction of educational science in relation to posthumanism and transhumanism in artificial intelligence. Turkish Academic Research Review, 10(1), 70–83.
  17. Garimella, A., Mihalcea, R., & Amarnath, A. (2022). Demographic-aware language model fine-tuning as a bias mitigation technique. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 12th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 311–319). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  18. https://aclanthology.org/2022.aacl-short.39
  19. Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128.
  20. Gautam, S., Chandra, M., De, A., Chakravorti, T., Malik, G., & De Choudhury, M. (2025). Towards experience-centered AI: A framework for integrating lived experience in design and development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06849.
  21. Girju, R. (2023, October). Understanding lived experience: Bridging artificial intelligence and natural language processing with humanities and social sciences. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1292, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing.
  22. Gwaravanda, E., & Ndofirepi, A. (2020). Eurocentric pitfalls in the practice of African philosophy: Reflections on African universities. Phronimon, 21(1), 1–21.
  23. Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850.
  24. Heywood, A. (2021). Political ideologies: An introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  25. Holland, S., & Novak, D. (2017). Critical analysis. In The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods(Vol. 4, pp. 295-296). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n109
  26. Holliday, A. (2021). Intercultural communication: An advanced resource book for students (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  27. Johnston, J. W., & Mason, C. W. (2021). Rethinking representation: Shifting from a Eurocentric lens to indigenous methods of sharing knowledge in Jasper National Park, Canada. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 39(3), 1–19.
  28. Jubba, H., Awang, J., Qodir, Z., Hannani, & Pabbajah, M. (2022). The contestation between conservative and moderate Muslims in promoting Islamic moderatism in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2116162.
  29. Jung, D. (2023). Islam in global modernity: Sociological theory and the diversity of Islamic modernities. Springer.
  30. Karimullah, S. S. (2023). For true humanity: Harmonization of Islamic law and human rights towards universal justice. Matan: Journal of Islam and Muslim Society, 5(2), 40–56.
  31. Kostina, E., Kretova, L., Teleshova, R., Tsepkova, A., & Vezirov, T. (2015). Universal human values: Cross-cultural comparative analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1019–1028.
  32. Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. Q. (2023). Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261276445
  33. Lewis, A. A. (2025). Unpacking Cultural Bias in AI Language Learning Tools: An Analysis of Impacts and Strategies for Inclusion in Diverse Educational Settings. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(1), 1878-1892.
  34. Liao, Q. V., & Vaughan, J. W. (2023). AI transparency in the age of LLMs: A human-centered research roadmap. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01941.
  35. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01941
  36. Liu, Z. (2025). Cultural bias in large language models: A comprehensive analysis and mitigation strategies. Journal of Transcultural Communication, 3(2), 224–244.
  37. Naous, T., Ryan, M. J., & Xu, W. (2023). Having beer after prayer? Measuring cultural bias in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14456. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14456
  38. Mahboob, K., Asif, R., & Umme, L. (2024). Leveraging generative AI for cross-cultural knowledge exchange in higher education. In Facilitating global collaboration and knowledge sharing in higher education with generative AI (pp. 186–206). IGI Global.
  39. Mak, M. K., & Luo, T. (2025). A framework for evaluating cultural bias and historical misconceptions in LLMs outputs. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 100235.
  40. Miike, Y. (2023). Culture as text and culture as theory: Asiacentricity and its raison d'etre in intercultural communication research. In The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 129–150). Routledge.
  41. Mite, M. K., & Binawan, H. (2025). Students’ perception about intercultural competence (IC) in English speaking class. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 562–575.
  42. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 5079. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679
  43. Nath, R., & Manna, R. (2023). From posthumanism to ethics of artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 38(1), 185–196.
  44. Nemorin, S. (2024). Towards decolonising the ethics of AI in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2348492
  45. Noel, L. A., Ruiz, A., van Amstel, F. M., Udoewa, V., Verma, N., Botchway, N. K., ... & Agrawal, S. (2023). Pluriversal futures for design education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 9(2), 179–196.
  46. Pagan, N., Baumann, J., Elokda, E., De Pasquale, G., Bolognani, S., & Hannák, A. (2020). A classi cation of feedback loops and their relation to biases in automated decision-making systems. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 20(4). Article 49.
  47. Pant, K. R. (2023). Eight moments in the history of qualitative research. AMC Journal, 4(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.3126/amcjd.v4i1.58830
  48. Peters, M. A., Means, A. J., Ericson, D. P., Tukdeo, S., Bradley, J. P., Jackson, L., ... & Misiaszek, G. W. (2022). The China-threat discourse, trade, and the future of Asia: A symposium. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1531–1549.
  49. Putri, D. D. Y., Putra, D. R. S., Susanti, E., Mahardika, I. K., Mahmudi, K., & Zaki, S. F. A. (2024). The limitations of science and its implications in human life. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 7(4), 266–270.
  50. Qodir, Z., & Singh, B. (2023). The Contestation of Contemporary Islam: Conservative Islam versus Progressive Islam. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 23(2), 147-165.
  51. Ramesh, K., Sitaram, S., & Choudhury, M. (2023). Fairness in language models beyond English. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023 (pp. 1206–1219). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-eacl.89
  52. Rifai, D. S. L. (2022). A critique of the Eurocentrism and Islamic influence on Western civilization. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4097332
  53. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  54. Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus, 3(9), pgae346. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346
  55. Turner Lee, N., Resnick, P., & Barton, G. (2019). Algorithmic bias detection and mitigation: Best practices and policies to reduce consumer harms. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/algorithmic-bias-detection-and-mitigation-best-practices-and-policies-to-reduce-consumer-harms/
  56. Thomsen, M. R., & Wamberg, J. (Eds.). (2020). The Bloomsbury handbook of posthumanism. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  57. Yang, Y. (2025). Racial bias in AI-generated images. AI & SOCIETY. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-01897-w

This article is published under the CC BY 4.0 license.