e-ISSN: 2618-6586 Open Access · Peer-Reviewed JETOL on DergiPark
JETOL — Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning
Publisher
Gürhan Durak
Publication Model
Periodical (January – May – September)
Status
Open for Submissions

Research on science teacher education students’ digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions

Research Article

Download PDF DOI: 10.31681/jetol.1918581
Published in
Volume 9, Issue 2 (2026)
Pages
166–186
Publication Date
May 31, 2026
Submission Date
March 30, 2026
Acceptance Date
May 9, 2026
Subjects
Instructional Technologies, Science and Mathematics Education (Other), Educational Technology and Computing

Abstract

This study aimed to identify science teacher education students’ digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions, and to examine whether these perceptions differ according to various variables (gender, type of high school attended, age, year of university education, possession of a personal computer, having internet access, and daily internet usage time). The study also examined relationship between science teacher education students’ digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions. The study was conducted with participation of 140 science teacher education students studying at a university in the west of Türkiye. The sample was selected using criterion sampling and convenience sampling methods. Data were collected using the Digital Competence Perception Scale, Scientific Literacy Perceptions Scale and a personal information form. Descriptive statistics were calculated and t-test and one-way analysis of variance for independent samples, and correlation analysis was performed to analyze data. The research results indicated that science teacher education students’ both digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions were at high levels. It was found that there were no significant differences in digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions according to gender and type of high school attended. It was concluded that scientific literacy perceptions indicated significant difference according to year of university education, and digital competence perceptions demonstrated significant differences according to age, possession of a personal computer and having internet access, and daily internet usage time. The study also revealed that there was a statistically significant, moderate and positive correlation between science teacher education students’ digital competence and scientific literacy perceptions.

Keywords

  • Digital competence perception
  • scientific literacy perception
  • science teacher education students
References (59)
  1. Abouelenein, Y. A. M., Selim, S. A. S., & Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2024). Impact of a virtual chemistry lab in chemistry teaching on scientific practices and digital competence for pre-service science teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2805-2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11918-y
  2. Afacan-Adanır G., & Gülbahar Güven Y., (2022). Turkish adaptation of university students’ basic digital competences scale. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 12(1), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.990452
  3. Aktaş, M. A., Çittir, K., Şahin, M. A., Aktaş, İ., & Baltacı, H. (2025). Comparative analysis of pre-service teachers’ 21st century skills and digital competencies. Trakya Journal of Education, 15(4), 1691-1733. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1513611
  4. Alpar, R. (2020). Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik [Applied statistics and validity-reliability with examples from sports, health and educational sciences] (4th ed.). Detay Yayıncılık.
  5. Aşıcı, F., & Temel, H. (2023). Analysis of secondary school mathematics textbooks in the context of digital competence. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 885-910. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1365383
  6. Başar, T., & Elyıldırım, E. (2022). Investigation of preschool teachers’ science literacy levels and attitudes towards science teaching. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Journal, 23(1), 1268-130. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.987910
  7. Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N. B., Liman Kaban, A., Taşçı, G., & Aykul, M. (2021). Digital information age: Digital society, digital transformation, digital education and digital competencies. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 7(2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation] (28th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Demirel, F., Akgün, Ö. E., & Karadeniz, Ş. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi.
  10. Can, Ş., & Çelik, C. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ universal science literacy levels across the statistical regional units. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 49, 112-133. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.536777
  11. Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S. (2019). Örnekleme yöntemleri [Sampling methods]. In H. Özmen ve O. Karamustafaoğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods in education] (pp. 55-80). Pegem Akademi.
  12. Coşkunserçe, O., & Aydoğdu, Ş. (2022). Investigating the digital skills of undergraduate students in terms of various variables. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 1219-1237. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1151461
  13. Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2019). A training activity for improving the digital competences of pre-service teachers: The views of pre-service teacher in ceit and other disciplines. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 9(2), 346-371. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.562663
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50017-7
  15. Çalık, S., İnaltun, H., Ertuğrul, E. Y., & Ateş, S. (2024). Adaptation of the prospective science teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy scale. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(1), 187-218. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1226453
  16. Çittir, K., Aktaş, M. A., Şahin, M. A., Aktaş, İ., & Baltacı, H. (2025). The predictive power of pre-service teachers’ 21st century skills on digital competencies. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, (74), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1476049
  17. Çolak, Ö. (2014). Sorgulayıcı-araştırmaya dayalı fen öğretimi yönteminin fen okuryazarlığı ve bazı alt-boyutları üzerine etkisi [The effect of the inquiry-based science teaching method on scientific literacy and the certain sub-scale of scientific literacy] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Trakya University.
  18. Doğan, O. (2023). Examining the digital competence levels of faculty members: research on tourism academicians. Journal of Tourism Intelligence and Smartness, 6(2), 98-106. http://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1341973
  19. Fidan, M., & Cura-Yeleğen, H. (2022). An investigation of teachers’ digital competencies in terms of various variables and their needs for digital competence. Ege Journal of Education, 23(2), 150-170. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.1075367
  20. Filiz, O. & Kurt, A. A. (2022). The effect of preservice teachers’ experiences in a flipped course on digital competencies related to educational technology and innovativeness. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(3), 655-675. http://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1118674
  21. Galimullina, E. Z., Ljubimova, E. M., Mukhametshina, D. R., & Sozontova, E. A. (2022). Analysis of requirements for the digital competence of a future teacher. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1729-1745. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu jer.11.3.1729
  22. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2021). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (17th edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003205333
  23. Hiçyorulmaz, E., Çenesiz, M. U., Kılıçarslan, Ş., & Tumbuloğlu, M. (2024). Measuring students’ digital competency levels: The sample of Hitit University. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 19(2), 43-64. https://izlik.org/JA88CF22XF
  24. Kaman, Ş. (2025). The relationship between prospective classroom teachers’ digital competencies and artificial intelligence literacy levels. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1663406
  25. Karakuş, İ., Sünbül, Ö., & Kılıç, F. (2022). Teacher candidate digital proficiency perception scale: validity and reliability study. Bayburt Journal of Education Faculty (BJEF), 17(35), 935-956. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.883974
  26. Kavak, N., Tufan, Y., & Demirelli, H. (2006). Science and technology literacy and informal science education: potential role of newspapers. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education (JoGEF), 26(3), 17-28. https://izlik.org/JA34XT66NY
  27. Kaya, R., & Uyangör, N. (2022). Examination of the relationship between education faculty students’ technology integration self-competence perceptions and digital competence levels. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 22(2), 552-571. https://dx.doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2022..-793735
  28. Keskin, F., & Çam, A. (2019). The effectiveness of context-based react strategy on sixth grade students’ academic achievement and scientific literacy. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 49, 38-59. https://izlik.org/JA93DY43AT
  29. Keskin, İ., & Yazar, T. (2015). Examining digital competence of teachers within the context of lifelong learning based on of the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1691-1711. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v12i2.3503
  30. Kılınçaslan, H., & Dökme, İ. (2022). Science literacy in Turkey: A descriptional content analysis. Trakya Journal of Education, 12(2), 911-925. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.943835
  31. Köksal, D., & Canlı, S. (2024). Examination of teachers’ digital competencies. Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), 8(1), 1-21. https://izlik.org/JA33JW79UD
  32. Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2017). Computation of effect sizes. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329
  33. Martínez-Bravo, C., Sádaba-Chalezquer, C., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2022). Dimensions of digital literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks. Sustainability, 14(3), 1867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031867
  34. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Science curriculum for primary education institutions (Grades 3,4,5,6,7 and 8)].. MEB yayınları.
  35. Oikarinen, M., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Pöntinen, S., & Oikarinen, J. K. (2026). The school community in developing teachers’ digital competence. Professional Development in Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2026.2625129
  36. Özdemir, O. (2010). Situation of the pre-service science and technology teachers’ scientific literacy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(3), 42-56. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/522
  37. Özden, M., & Örge-Yaşar, F. (2024). Digital competences of faculty of education students. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 12(3), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1496401
  38. Özkan-Kanat, B. (2023). Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının dijital yeterlilik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of digital competence levels of pre service Turkish teachers] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
  39. Öztürk, G. (2021). Digital citizenship and its teaching: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 31-45. http://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.857904
  40. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  41. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission. Y. Punie (Ed.), JRC science for policy report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  42. Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education: A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 250-280. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-03
  43. Salcı, E., & Aydın, A. (2022). Examination of teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ universal science literacy levels in terms of some variables. Trakya Journal of Education, 12(1), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.876128
  44. Salcı, E., & Aydın, A. (2021). Secondary school students’ universal science literacy levels. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (10), 202-219. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.879341
  45. Saygıner, Ş., & Laçin, E. (2024). Investigating the effect of technology-supported educational activities on the digital competence levels of special education teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(14), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.56677/mkuefder.1532760
  46. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768, https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
  47. Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The development and validation of an instrument of prospective science teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11505
  48. Şahin, R., Sanalan, V., Bektaş, Ö., & Kaygısız, Y. (2014). The effect of parent’s science literacy on science and technology achievement of seventh grade students in elementary school. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 125-143. https://izlik.org/JA83PZ29TM
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th edition). Pearson Publication.
  50. Toker, T., Akgün, E., Edip, S., & Cömert, Z. (2021). Digital competency scale for educators: Adaptation, validity and reliability study. Milli Eğitim Journal, 50(230), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.801607
  51. Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The HeDiCom framework: Higher Education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5
  52. Tunç-Şahin, C., & Say, Ö. (2010). Investigation of scientific literacy levels of elementary students. ZKU Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), 223-240. https://izlik.org/JA45EF65CN
  53. Turgut, H. (2007). Scientific literacy for all. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000176
  54. Ünlü, D., & Yıldırır, H. E. (2024, April 25-27). Examination of pre-service science teachers’ views on science literacy. 2nd International 21. Century Educational Research Congress, Burdur, Türkiye.
  55. Vosough-Matin, M. (2025) Investigation of digital competencies and artificial intelligence literacy of special education students. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 9(2), 501-525. https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2025.430
  56. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens- with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, EUR 31006 EN, Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
  57. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (8th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  58. Yılmaz, E., & Toker, T. (2022). How did the COVID-19 outbreak affected the digital competencies of teachers’? Milli Egitim Journal, 51(235), 2713-2730. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.896996
  59. Yılmaz-Özden, Ş. (2023). Investigating the relationship between digital instructional material development self-efficacy, digital literacy and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 911-924. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1360830

This article is published under the CC BY 4.0 license.